Share/Save/Bookmark

VSHL BLAST

September/October 2009

 

Virginia Society for Human Life is the oldest pro-life organization in the nation with chapters throughout the Commonwealth.

 

Introducing the Virginia Society for Human Life (VSHL) Blast for Chapter Leaders and Membership—this is an ALERT on current issues affecting the Right to Life.   

 

 ALERT:    For Immediate Release:                                             For further information:

                  September 10, 2009                                                                   Olivia Gans

                                                                                                                        Margaret H. Disney

                                      804.560.8745

 

National Right to Life and Virginia Society for Human Life

note misleading remarks by President Obama

 to the Joint Session of Congress

 

National Right to Life Committee and its Virginia affiliate, Virginia Society for Human Life, today call out President Obama for misleading remarks he made in his joint session address last night. 

In his address to a joint session of Congress last night, President Obama said, "One more misunderstanding I want to clear up -- under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions."


Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, commented: "Barack Obama needs to learn that the mere repetition of a verbal formula does not change reality.  The reality is that the Obama-backed House bill would explicitly authorize the federal government insurance plan to pay for elective abortions and would explicitly authorize subsidies for private abortion insurance -- and all with federal dollars, which are the only kind of dollars that the federal government can spend."
 
The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) last week released definitive memoranda that demonstrate that (1) the "Hyde Amendment" would not apply to the new programs that would be created by the Obama-backed health bill, H.R. 3200, and (2) that all of the funds that would be spent on elective abortions under the bill, and all of the funds that would be spent to subsidize private insurance plans that cover abortion, would be "federal funds" in both the legal sense and in the sense in which those terms are used throughout the government. 

 "The claim that a federal agency would be spending private funds on abortion, not federal funds, is absurd on its face, a political hoax," Johnson said.
 
Oivia Gans, President of VSHL, said that Virginians have a special duty to require commitments from their members of Congress and the Senate that they will work to specifically exclude abortion coverage under any health care reform bills.

“Virginians do not believe that abortion is health care.  They don’t want their taxes paying for the deaths of innocent unborn children,” Gans continued.

 

ACTION:

1.    Please call your Congressman in the House of Representatives and ask him to vote against any health care bill that does not explicitly exclude abortion.

 

2.   Ask him to vote against any Rule of the House that would not allow an   amendment to be made for the purpose of explicitly prohibiting abortion coverage under the bill. 

 

3.    Call Virginia’s two Senators, Mark Warner and Jim Webb, and ask them to vote against any health care reform bill that that does not explicitly exclude abortion.

 

Call the offices of your two U.S. senators and your representative through the Senate switchboard, 202-224-3121, and the House switchboard, 202.225-3121.  Give your zip code and you will be connected to the correct office.

Key Talking Points on Health Care Rationing

 

NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE (NRLC) - AUGUST 2009

 

Medicare and Health Care Rationing

A substantial part of health care subsidies, under current proposals, would be paid for by “robbing Peter to pay Paul” -- reducing Medicare funding for older people in order to cover the uninsured.

 

Over-Promising and Under-Funding Means Rationing

The proposals under serious consideration fail to ensure a sustainable method of financing the subsidies. Over-promising while under-funding health insurance for the uninsured will almost surely lead to rationing.

 

Comparative Effectiveness and Rationing

There is no protective language in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee (HELP) bill (unnumbered) or House bill (HR 3200) to guarantee that the government cannot use “comparative effectiveness” research using “quality-adjusted life years” or other measures to compel or encourage denial of lifesaving medical treatment, food, or fluids based on the patient’s age disability or so-called “quality of life.”

 

Pressuring Patients to forgo Treatment:   A Means of Rationing

Efforts to push patients and older people to prepare advance directives may, in practice, not center on respecting an individual’s wishes, but rather on persuading or pressuring them to agree to less treatment as a means of saving money.

 

for more information:

visit www.nrlc.org

 

Take Action and Make Your Voice Heard!

 

Visit the NRLC Legislative Action Center at www.nrlactioncenter.com

 

VSHL’S New PAC Website:  (TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2009 IS ELECTION DAY IN VIRGINIA.  Virginians will be electing a Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and all 100 Delegates and Senators are also up for election/re-election)

 

VSHLPAC has launched www.deedsisforabortion.com, a new website dedicated to getting out the truth about just how pro-abortion Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate Creigh Deeds actually is.

 

Pro-life Virginians have a clear decision to make in the voting booth this year between Pro-life Bob McDonnell and Pro-abortion Creigh Deeds.


Visit
www.deedsisforabortion.com and share with your pro-life family and friends as well!

Check out the new site as well as the main home page of VSHLPAC,

www.vshlpac.org for more info and continued updates on races throughout  Virginia.

How to contact us:  VSHL 6767 Forest Hill Ave, Suite 270, Richmond, VA 23225; Phone:  804-560-8745; www.vshl.org; e-mail:  vshl67@comcast.net

VSHL Blast:  knowinsky@aol.com

 

 

 

Talking Points on Health Care Rationing

 

Key Talking Points Health Care Rationing

 

Key Talking Points on Health Care Rationing

 

NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE - AUGUST 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEDICARE AND HEALTH CARE RATIONING
   
  • A substantial part of health care subsidies, under current proposals, would be paid for by "robbing Peter to pay Paul" --reducing Medicare funding for older people in order to cover the uninsured.
 
OVER-PROMISING AND UNDER-FUNDING MEANS RATIONING
 
  • The proposals under serious consideration fail to ensure a sustainable method of financing the subsidies. Over-promising while under-funding health insurance for the uninsured will almost surely lead to rationing.
COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH CARE RATIONING
 
  • There is no protective language in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee (HELP) bill (unnumbered) or House bill (HR 3200) to guarantee that the government cannot use “comparative effectiveness” research using “quality-adjusted life years” or other measures to compel or encourage denial of lifesaving medical treatment, food, or fluids based on the patient’s age disability or so-called “quality of life.”
PRESSURING PATIENTS TO FORGO TREATMENT:
A MEANS OF RATIONING
  • Efforts to push patients and older people to prepare advance directives may, in practice, not center on respecting an individual’s wishes, but rather on persuading or pressuring them to agree to less treatment as a means of saving money.
 

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Download the file attached below or visit www.nrlc.org

Take action and make your voice heard!
Visit our Legislative Action Center at www.nrlactioncenter.com